STEEM BURNPOST Initiative in Solidarity with Steemit's Reduction in Stake Selling

Pixabay Image

In today's @steemitblog post, entitled "Steem.DAO UI Live on SteemitWallet" there was an announcement inside which I feel deserved its own post.

The announcement as follows:

Update on Programmatic Selling We will not be selling any STEEM this month. We have continued to improve revenue generation through ads while lowering our expenses, but we are still a long ways from covering our operating costs 100%. That being said, we have put ourselves in a position where we can pause programmatic selling, as we are this month. This is a very important benchmark for us because it was not something we were in a position to do just a few months ago.

Leadership matters

It can be said that Steemit Inc, has really worked hard to change their spots and to change the stars for the future of the Steem community. In stark contrast to the company they once were, burning through funds, missing scheduled public appearances and laying off 70% of its staff merely a year ago. Under the helm, of its new Managing Director, Elizabeth Powell, Steemit inc, has indeed shown the grace and resourcefulness of a female thought leader.

Powell, drastically cut costs in rental and many unnecessary superflous expenses and has turned Steemit Inc, into a lean running ship, further assisted by a massively talented dev team that released the cost-saving node infrastructure, dubbed MIRA, which has reduced their AWS hosting costs by circa 80% and has done the same for many Steem based businesses and witnesses (block producers) who have the cost of running Steem nodes.

Under the direction of Eli Powell, the dev team have kept all promises and released HF22 with new the Steem Proposal System funding protocol for funding community proposals for the betterment of Steem, as well as the EIP - Economic Improvement Protocol which enhanced curation and included free downvotes to incentivise spam fighting and non-beneficial rewards extraction.

I have had the pleasure in speaking with Eli myself in DM and I can say she is a genuine and down to earth person, with a heart for the community, in addition, her promises are backed by the team's newfound ability to deliver timeously and professionally.

Big ups to Eli Powell and the team for listening to the community and reducing their selling in their corporate social responsibility strategy.

In stark contrast to Steem, "XRP HODLers Speak Out Against Ripple" for continuously selling without heed to community sentiment.

I disclose that I hold both Ripple and STEEM, but today I am the most proud to be holding STEEM!


The burnpost idea was originally conceived by @smooth, where a daily @burnpost post was launched that stakeholders could vote on and instead direct rewards to @null which effectively burns them.

What if in response to Steemit's reduction in selling, the community responds by burning a percentage of their post rewards by setting a beneficiary percentage to @null (easily done using Curators could in turn favour curating such posts over others.

Steemit's selling reduction of 1 month equates to a total annual reduction of 8.3% with more potentially planned as they rely more on advertising and less on the Steem sell-off.

The community should respond in solidarity by burning at least a rounded up 10% of their organic posts and more if their posts are promoted with a promotion service.

BuildTeam has pledged to burn a min of 20% of every promoted post and sometimes we will burn as much as 50%. @theycallmedan is a big believer in burnposts and this idea stems greatly from discussions I had with him over the last few days, his personal strategy is to vote organic posts and only vote promoted posts with a 50% or greater burn if organic votes thereon were not sufficient.

I standby this idea and challenge the entire community to burn rewards from each and every post, albeit organic or promoted.

Also, standby for further updates from the @minnowbooster account where, we will update you tomorrow of our initiative to augment our service to facilitate these ideals.

Don't forget on all your posts to put a BURNPOST disclaimer like I have in the footer, you can even make some cool graphics, meme's and art for it.

My post really is a 100% burnpost as can be verified on, but you can set your own percentage you deem appropriate as per above recommendations.



Ricardo Ferreira @thecryptodrive BuildTeam CEO Steem Consensus Witness

If you like what I do, vote for @thecryptodrive witness with this vote link:

Or use the quick SteemConnect link:

Beneficiary Disclaimer: This is a 100% BURNPOST, by virtue of beneficiary set to @null.

Steemie currently dosen't allow you to make comments. If you want to write something, write it using another frontend (like Steemit)
Click there to view this post on
  • @crypticat

    Good idea, have an upvote, or burnvote!

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @ash

    Steemit, @steempeak @esteemapp could introduce badges, like 5% to DAO adds a donators badge to the post etc

  • @crypto.piotr

    Dear @thecryptodrive

    Indeed since Elizabeth took over things are getting better. I'm also more optimistic about the future of STEEM already (comparing to days when Ned was fully in charge).

    Any idea is STINC is still being forced to sell their own STEEM supplies in order to cover operational expenses and how much do they sell monthly?

    What if in response to Steemit's reduction in selling, the community responds by burning a percentage of their post rewards by setting a beneficiary percentage to @null

    I absolutely appreciate idea of burning tokens, however I'm failing to understand how can it really help to maintain price of tokens if speed of burning tokens is still way smaller than speed of "printing" new ones (inflation).

    Let's not forget that burning tokens isn't creating demand. Please don't take me wrong: I'm not complaining here. I'm just not sure why so many people see burning tokens as a way of pushing price upward. That could be only the case if supply isn't growing.

    So the fact that we will burn part of inflation isn't really going to increase buying pressure. It may obviously partly reduce selling pressure, but only assiming that users who are burning those tokens would otherwise sell them (instead of staking). At the end of the day burning part of our rewards will affect price as much as staking it and powering up. It simply won't.

    Correct me please if I'm wrong. I've been working on math and thinking of token economies for very long and my impression is that I'm right :)

    ps. How can we check what SPS has been proposed and approved/declined? Any idea?

    Strong upvote on the way :) Catch! Yours Piotr

  • @transisto

    What if in response to Steemit's reduction in selling, the community responds by burning a percentage of their post rewards by setting a beneficiary percentage to @null


  • @yoshiokanetsuna

    Oh so this is serious!

  • @adedapo-glory

    Wow. For a firsy time, it now seems like steem is heading to the right direction. This is great to hear

  • @chireerocks

    @thecryptodrive, There is no doubt in that Elizabeth Powell brought lot of positive environment and results for the Steemit Inc.

    Yes, @theycallmedan is really bullish towards the idea of Steem Burn and many are appreciating the idea and following the foot steps.

    I really want to appreciate your efforts and the changes adopted by the BuildTeam. Keep up the effective journey and stay blessed.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @binkyprod

    I don't understand what burning does. Also, how would someone who makes very little benefit from burning posts? A lot of people here really nned those rewards, especially now that their content is making less. I myself find myself in need of much convincing if I were to agree to do this.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @tayyab45

    Soo nice day

  • @pennsif

    This post has been included in the latest edition of The Steem News - a compilation of the key news stories on the Steem blockchain.

  • @mattsanthonyit

    Great initiative but it seems am little bit confused

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @thedarkhorse

    Interesting idea. Reduce the inflation rate by our own actions. With higher curation rates I can see people being onboard with the idea as they will still earn something on the backend while at the same time helping the long term price of STEEM.

    Will have to find a good way to implement this into @pifc's efforts. Maybe we can curate the #burnpost tag to help drive some attention to the effort.